Artificial Intelligence Nanodegree

Convolutional Neural Networks

Project: Write an Algorithm for a Dog Identification App


In this notebook, some template code has already been provided for you, and you will need to implement additional functionality to successfully complete this project. You will not need to modify the included code beyond what is requested. Sections that begin with '(IMPLEMENTATION)' in the header indicate that the following block of code will require additional functionality which you must provide. Instructions will be provided for each section, and the specifics of the implementation are marked in the code block with a 'TODO' statement. Please be sure to read the instructions carefully!

Note: Once you have completed all of the code implementations, you need to finalize your work by exporting the iPython Notebook as an HTML document. Before exporting the notebook to html, all of the code cells need to have been run so that reviewers can see the final implementation and output. You can then export the notebook by using the menu above and navigating to \n", "File -> Download as -> HTML (.html). Include the finished document along with this notebook as your submission.

In addition to implementing code, there will be questions that you must answer which relate to the project and your implementation. Each section where you will answer a question is preceded by a 'Question X' header. Carefully read each question and provide thorough answers in the following text boxes that begin with 'Answer:'. Your project submission will be evaluated based on your answers to each of the questions and the implementation you provide.

Note: Code and Markdown cells can be executed using the Shift + Enter keyboard shortcut. Markdown cells can be edited by double-clicking the cell to enter edit mode.

The rubric contains optional "Stand Out Suggestions" for enhancing the project beyond the minimum requirements. If you decide to pursue the "Stand Out Suggestions", you should include the code in this IPython notebook.


Why We're Here

In this notebook, you will make the first steps towards developing an algorithm that could be used as part of a mobile or web app. At the end of this project, your code will accept any user-supplied image as input. If a dog is detected in the image, it will provide an estimate of the dog's breed. If a human is detected, it will provide an estimate of the dog breed that is most resembling. The image below displays potential sample output of your finished project (... but we expect that each student's algorithm will behave differently!).

Sample Dog Output

In this real-world setting, you will need to piece together a series of models to perform different tasks; for instance, the algorithm that detects humans in an image will be different from the CNN that infers dog breed. There are many points of possible failure, and no perfect algorithm exists. Your imperfect solution will nonetheless create a fun user experience!

The Road Ahead

We break the notebook into separate steps. Feel free to use the links below to navigate the notebook.

  • Step 0: Import Datasets
  • Step 1: Detect Humans
  • Step 2: Detect Dogs
  • Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)
  • Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)
  • Step 6: Write your Algorithm
  • Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

Step 0: Import Datasets

Import Dog Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of dog images. We populate a few variables through the use of the load_files function from the scikit-learn library:

  • train_files, valid_files, test_files - numpy arrays containing file paths to images
  • train_targets, valid_targets, test_targets - numpy arrays containing onehot-encoded classification labels
  • dog_names - list of string-valued dog breed names for translating labels
In [23]:
from sklearn.datasets import load_files       
from keras.utils import np_utils
import numpy as np
from glob import glob

# define function to load train, test, and validation datasets
def load_dataset(path):
    data = load_files(path)
    dog_files = np.array(data['filenames'])
    dog_targets = np_utils.to_categorical(np.array(data['target']), 133)
    return dog_files, dog_targets

# load train, test, and validation datasets
train_files, train_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/train')
valid_files, valid_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/valid')
test_files, test_targets = load_dataset('dogImages/test')

# load list of dog names
dog_names = [item[20:-1] for item in sorted(glob("dogImages/train/*/"))]

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total dog categories.' % len(dog_names))
print('There are %s total dog images.\n' % len(np.hstack([train_files, valid_files, test_files])))
print('There are %d training dog images.' % len(train_files))
print('There are %d validation dog images.' % len(valid_files))
print('There are %d test dog images.'% len(test_files))
Using TensorFlow backend.
There are 133 total dog categories.
There are 8351 total dog images.

There are 6680 training dog images.
There are 835 validation dog images.
There are 836 test dog images.

Import Human Dataset

In the code cell below, we import a dataset of human images, where the file paths are stored in the numpy array human_files.

In [24]:
import random
random.seed(8675309)

# load filenames in shuffled human dataset
human_files = np.array(glob("lfw/lfw/*/*"))
random.shuffle(human_files)

# print statistics about the dataset
print('There are %d total human images.' % len(human_files))
There are 13233 total human images.

Step 1: Detect Humans

We use OpenCV's implementation of Haar feature-based cascade classifiers to detect human faces in images. OpenCV provides many pre-trained face detectors, stored as XML files on github. We have downloaded one of these detectors and stored it in the haarcascades directory.

In the next code cell, we demonstrate how to use this detector to find human faces in a sample image.

In [25]:
import cv2                
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt                        
%matplotlib inline                               

# extract pre-trained face detector
face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('haarcascades/haarcascade_frontalface_alt.xml')

# load color (BGR) image
img = cv2.imread(human_files[3])
# convert BGR image to grayscale
gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

# find faces in image
faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)

# print number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected:', len(faces))

# get bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in faces:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img,(x,y),(x+w,y+h),(255,0,0),2)
    
# convert BGR image to RGB for plotting
cv_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# display the image, along with bounding box
plt.imshow(cv_rgb)
plt.show()
Number of faces detected: 1

Before using any of the face detectors, it is standard procedure to convert the images to grayscale. The detectMultiScale function executes the classifier stored in face_cascade and takes the grayscale image as a parameter.

In the above code, faces is a numpy array of detected faces, where each row corresponds to a detected face. Each detected face is a 1D array with four entries that specifies the bounding box of the detected face. The first two entries in the array (extracted in the above code as x and y) specify the horizontal and vertical positions of the top left corner of the bounding box. The last two entries in the array (extracted here as w and h) specify the width and height of the box.

Write a Human Face Detector

We can use this procedure to write a function that returns True if a human face is detected in an image and False otherwise. This function, aptly named face_detector, takes a string-valued file path to an image as input and appears in the code block below.

In [26]:
# returns "True" if face is detected in image stored at img_path
def face_detector(img_path):
    img = cv2.imread(img_path)
    gray = cv2.cvtColor(img, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    faces = face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    return len(faces) > 0

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Human Face Detector

Question 1: Use the code cell below to test the performance of the face_detector function.

  • What percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face?
  • What percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face?

Ideally, we would like 100% of human images with a detected face and 0% of dog images with a detected face. You will see that our algorithm falls short of this goal, but still gives acceptable performance. We extract the file paths for the first 100 images from each of the datasets and store them in the numpy arrays human_files_short and dog_files_short.

__Answer:

Percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: 98.0%

Percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: 11.0% __

In [27]:
human_files_short = human_files[:100]
dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line.
correct_human_human_list = 0  
correct_human_dog_list = 0
human_first_hundred=[]
dog_first_hundred=[]
for i in range(len(human_files_short)):
    human_first_hundred.append(face_detector(human_files_short[i]))  
    if human_first_hundred[i]>0:
        correct_human_human_list +=1
#print ('human', human_first_hundred)
for i in range(len(dog_files_short)):
    dog_first_hundred.append(face_detector(dog_files_short[i]))
    if dog_first_hundred[i]>0:
        correct_human_dog_list += 1
#print ('dog', dog_first_hundred)
print ("correct human numbers identified fronm human list :", correct_human_human_list)

print ("correct human numbers identified from dog list:", correct_human_dog_list)

print(" percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: {}%".format((correct_human_human_list/len (human_first_hundred))*100))
print("percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: {}%".format((correct_human_dog_list/len(dog_first_hundred))*100))

## TODO: Test the performance of the face_detector algorithm 
## on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
correct human numbers identified fronm human list : 98
correct human numbers identified from dog list: 11
 percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: 98.0%
percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: 11.0%

Question 2: This algorithmic choice necessitates that we communicate to the user that we accept human images only when they provide a clear view of a face (otherwise, we risk having unneccessarily frustrated users!). In your opinion, is this a reasonable expectation to pose on the user? If not, can you think of a way to detect humans in images that does not necessitate an image with a clearly presented face?

Answer:

I referred the following website: https://www.superdatascience.com/opencv-face-detection/

I think the other way to detect humans in images that does not necessitate an image with a clearly presented face is to have some more images with sideviews etc (augmented), so that it can learn that they are the human faces. As of now, the face recognition as password for computers demands to be presented with clearly presented face. May be as the technology advances it will be possible very soon.

I explored some resources for OpenCV. OpenCV provides us with two pre-trained and ready to be used for face detection classifiers:

1.) Haar Classifier 2.) LBP Classifier (Local Binary Pattern)

We already used Haar Classifier in the previous question.

The advantages & disadvantages of Haar Classifier are as follows:

Advantages:

  1. High detection accuracy
  2. Low false positive rate

Disadvantages:

  1. Computationally complex and slow.
  2. Longer training time
  3. Less accurate on dark skin color
  4. Limitations in difficult lightening conditions.
  5. Less robust to occlusion.

The advantages & disadvantages of LBP Classifier are as follows:

Advantages:

  1. Computationally simple and fast
  2. shorter training time
  3. Robust to local illumination changes
  4. Robust to Occlusion

Disadvantages

  1. Less accurate
  2. High false positive rate.

LBP is a visual/texture descriptor, and faces are also composed of micro visual patterns. So, LBP features are extracted to form a feature vector that classifies a face from a non-face. I expect lower accuracy score from LBP as compared to Haar Classifier. Also, I expect much higher false positives(more number of dogs will be identified as human).

The actual results are as follows:

**lbp percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: 100.0% lbp percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: 100.0%

We can see there are 100% false positives as all dogs have been identified as humans. LBP can not be used where accuracy is required, but it is faster as compared to Haar classifier.

We suggest the face detector from OpenCV as a potential way to detect human images in your algorithm, but you are free to explore other approaches, especially approaches that make use of deep learning :). Please use the code cell below to design and test your own face detection algorithm. If you decide to pursue this optional task, report performance on each of the datasets.

In [28]:
## (Optional) TODO: Report the performance of another  
## face detection algorithm on the LFW dataset
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
In [29]:
# extract pre-trained face detector
lbp_face_cascade = cv2.CascadeClassifier('lbpcascades/lbpcascade_frontalface.xml')

# load color (BGR) image
test2 = cv2.imread(human_files[3])
# convert BGR image to grayscale
lbp_gray = cv2.cvtColor(test2, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)

# find faces in image
lbp_faces = lbp_face_cascade.detectMultiScale(lbp_gray)

# print number of faces detected in the image
print('Number of faces detected by lbp:', len(lbp_faces))

# get bounding box for each detected face
for (x,y,w,h) in lbp_faces:
    # add bounding box to color image
    cv2.rectangle(img,(x,y),(x+w,y+h),(255,0,0),2)
    
# convert BGR image to RGB for plotting
lbp_cv_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(test2, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)

# display the image, along with bounding box
plt.imshow(lbp_cv_rgb)
plt.show()
Number of faces detected by lbp: 1
In [30]:
# returns "True" if lbp_face is detected in image stored at img_path
def lbp_face_detector(lbp_img_path):
    test2 = cv2.imread(lbp_img_path)
    lbp_gray = cv2.cvtColor(test2, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
    lbp_faces = lbp_face_cascade.detectMultiScale(gray)
    return len(lbp_faces) > 0
In [31]:
lbp_human_files_short = human_files[:100]
lbp_dog_files_short = train_files[:100]
# Do NOT modify the code above this line.
lbp_correct_human_human_list = 0  
lbp_correct_human_dog_list = 0
lbp_human_first_hundred=[]
lbp_dog_first_hundred=[]
for i in range(len(lbp_human_files_short)):
    lbp_human_first_hundred.append(lbp_face_detector(lbp_human_files_short[i]))  
    if lbp_human_first_hundred[i]>0:
        lbp_correct_human_human_list +=1
#print ('lbp_human', lbp_human_first_hundred)
for i in range(len(lbp_dog_files_short)):
    lbp_dog_first_hundred.append(lbp_face_detector(lbp_dog_files_short[i]))
    if lbp_dog_first_hundred[i]>0:
        lbp_correct_human_dog_list += 1
#print ('lbp_dog', lbp_dog_first_hundred)
print ("lbp_correct human numbers identified fronm human list :", lbp_correct_human_human_list)

print ("lbp_correct human numbers identified from dog list:", lbp_correct_human_dog_list)

print("lbp percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: {}%".format((lbp_correct_human_human_list/len (lbp_human_first_hundred))*100))
print("lbp percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: {}%".format((lbp_correct_human_dog_list/len(lbp_dog_first_hundred))*100))
lbp_correct human numbers identified fronm human list : 100
lbp_correct human numbers identified from dog list: 100
lbp percentage of the first 100 images in human_files have a detected human face: 100.0%
lbp percentage of the first 100 images in dog_files have a detected human face: 100.0%

Step 2: Detect Dogs

In this section, we use a pre-trained ResNet-50 model to detect dogs in images. Our first line of code downloads the ResNet-50 model, along with weights that have been trained on ImageNet, a very large, very popular dataset used for image classification and other vision tasks. ImageNet contains over 10 million URLs, each linking to an image containing an object from one of 1000 categories. Given an image, this pre-trained ResNet-50 model returns a prediction (derived from the available categories in ImageNet) for the object that is contained in the image.

In [32]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50

# define ResNet50 model
ResNet50_model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet')

Pre-process the Data

When using TensorFlow as backend, Keras CNNs require a 4D array (which we'll also refer to as a 4D tensor) as input, with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, \text{rows}, \text{columns}, \text{channels}), $$

where nb_samples corresponds to the total number of images (or samples), and rows, columns, and channels correspond to the number of rows, columns, and channels for each image, respectively.

The path_to_tensor function below takes a string-valued file path to a color image as input and returns a 4D tensor suitable for supplying to a Keras CNN. The function first loads the image and resizes it to a square image that is $224 \times 224$ pixels. Next, the image is converted to an array, which is then resized to a 4D tensor. In this case, since we are working with color images, each image has three channels. Likewise, since we are processing a single image (or sample), the returned tensor will always have shape

$$ (1, 224, 224, 3). $$

The paths_to_tensor function takes a numpy array of string-valued image paths as input and returns a 4D tensor with shape

$$ (\text{nb_samples}, 224, 224, 3). $$

Here, nb_samples is the number of samples, or number of images, in the supplied array of image paths. It is best to think of nb_samples as the number of 3D tensors (where each 3D tensor corresponds to a different image) in your dataset!

In [33]:
from keras.preprocessing import image                  
from tqdm import tqdm

def path_to_tensor(img_path):
    # loads RGB image as PIL.Image.Image type
    img = image.load_img(img_path, target_size=(224, 224))
    # convert PIL.Image.Image type to 3D tensor with shape (224, 224, 3)
    x = image.img_to_array(img)
    # convert 3D tensor to 4D tensor with shape (1, 224, 224, 3) and return 4D tensor
    return np.expand_dims(x, axis=0)

def paths_to_tensor(img_paths):
    list_of_tensors = [path_to_tensor(img_path) for img_path in tqdm(img_paths)]
    return np.vstack(list_of_tensors)

Making Predictions with ResNet-50

Getting the 4D tensor ready for ResNet-50, and for any other pre-trained model in Keras, requires some additional processing. First, the RGB image is converted to BGR by reordering the channels. All pre-trained models have the additional normalization step that the mean pixel (expressed in RGB as $[103.939, 116.779, 123.68]$ and calculated from all pixels in all images in ImageNet) must be subtracted from every pixel in each image. This is implemented in the imported function preprocess_input. If you're curious, you can check the code for preprocess_input here.

Now that we have a way to format our image for supplying to ResNet-50, we are now ready to use the model to extract the predictions. This is accomplished with the predict method, which returns an array whose $i$-th entry is the model's predicted probability that the image belongs to the $i$-th ImageNet category. This is implemented in the ResNet50_predict_labels function below.

By taking the argmax of the predicted probability vector, we obtain an integer corresponding to the model's predicted object class, which we can identify with an object category through the use of this dictionary.

In [34]:
from keras.applications.resnet50 import preprocess_input, decode_predictions

def ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path):
    # returns prediction vector for image located at img_path
    img = preprocess_input(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    return np.argmax(ResNet50_model.predict(img))

Write a Dog Detector

While looking at the dictionary, you will notice that the categories corresponding to dogs appear in an uninterrupted sequence and correspond to dictionary keys 151-268, inclusive, to include all categories from 'Chihuahua' to 'Mexican hairless'. Thus, in order to check to see if an image is predicted to contain a dog by the pre-trained ResNet-50 model, we need only check if the ResNet50_predict_labels function above returns a value between 151 and 268 (inclusive).

We use these ideas to complete the dog_detector function below, which returns True if a dog is detected in an image (and False if not).

In [35]:
### returns "True" if a dog is detected in the image stored at img_path
def dog_detector(img_path):
    prediction = ResNet50_predict_labels(img_path)
    return ((prediction <= 268) & (prediction >= 151)) 

(IMPLEMENTATION) Assess the Dog Detector

Question 3: Use the code cell below to test the performance of your dog_detector function.

  • What percentage of the images in human_files_short have a detected dog?
  • What percentage of the images in dog_files_short have a detected dog?

Answer:

In [36]:
### TODO: Test the performance of the dog_detector function
### on the images in human_files_short and dog_files_short.
resNet_from_human_set = [dog_detector(human_files_short[i]) for i in range(len(human_files_short))]
resNet_from_dog_set = [dog_detector(dog_files_short[i]) for i in range(len(dog_files_short))]

#print('resNet_from_human_set:', resNet_from_human_set)
#print('resNet_from_dog_set:', resNet_from_dog_set)

dog_human_files = sum([1 for x in range(len(human_files_short)) if resNet_from_human_set[x]])
dog_dog_files = sum([1 for j in range(len(dog_files_short)) if resNet_from_dog_set[j]])

#print(' images in human_files_short have a detected dog', dog_human_files)
#print(' images in dog_files_short have a detected dog', dog_dog_files)
print('percent images in human_files_short have a detected dog', (dog_human_files*100/len(human_files_short)))
print('percent images in dog_files_short have a detected dog', (dog_dog_files*100/len(dog_files_short)))
percent images in human_files_short have a detected dog 2.0
percent images in dog_files_short have a detected dog 100.0

Step 3: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (from Scratch)

Now that we have functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, we need a way to predict breed from images. In this step, you will create a CNN that classifies dog breeds. You must create your CNN from scratch (so, you can't use transfer learning yet!), and you must attain a test accuracy of at least 1%. In Step 5 of this notebook, you will have the opportunity to use transfer learning to create a CNN that attains greatly improved accuracy.

Be careful with adding too many trainable layers! More parameters means longer training, which means you are more likely to need a GPU to accelerate the training process. Thankfully, Keras provides a handy estimate of the time that each epoch is likely to take; you can extrapolate this estimate to figure out how long it will take for your algorithm to train.

We mention that the task of assigning breed to dogs from images is considered exceptionally challenging. To see why, consider that even a human would have great difficulty in distinguishing between a Brittany and a Welsh Springer Spaniel.

Brittany Welsh Springer Spaniel

It is not difficult to find other dog breed pairs with minimal inter-class variation (for instance, Curly-Coated Retrievers and American Water Spaniels).

Curly-Coated Retriever American Water Spaniel

Likewise, recall that labradors come in yellow, chocolate, and black. Your vision-based algorithm will have to conquer this high intra-class variation to determine how to classify all of these different shades as the same breed.

Yellow Labrador Chocolate Labrador Black Labrador

We also mention that random chance presents an exceptionally low bar: setting aside the fact that the classes are slightly imabalanced, a random guess will provide a correct answer roughly 1 in 133 times, which corresponds to an accuracy of less than 1%.

Remember that the practice is far ahead of the theory in deep learning. Experiment with many different architectures, and trust your intuition. And, of course, have fun!

Pre-process the Data

We rescale the images by dividing every pixel in every image by 255.

In [37]:
from PIL import ImageFile                            
ImageFile.LOAD_TRUNCATED_IMAGES = True                 

# pre-process the data for Keras
train_tensors = paths_to_tensor(train_files).astype('float32')/255
valid_tensors = paths_to_tensor(valid_files).astype('float32')/255
test_tensors = paths_to_tensor(test_files).astype('float32')/255
100%|██████████| 6680/6680 [00:53<00:00, 123.78it/s]
100%|██████████| 835/835 [00:06<00:00, 137.53it/s]
100%|██████████| 836/836 [00:06<00:00, 138.22it/s]

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    model.summary()

We have imported some Python modules to get you started, but feel free to import as many modules as you need. If you end up getting stuck, here's a hint that specifies a model that trains relatively fast on CPU and attains >1% test accuracy in 5 epochs:

Sample CNN

Question 4: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. If you chose to use the hinted architecture above, describe why you think that CNN architecture should work well for the image classification task.

Answer:

I first started with the architecture given above and thereafter started bringing slight modification. Since I am using AWS p2.xlarge GPU compute, I can train and test pretty fast. Hence, when I tried to bring slight modification from the already given example I was not worried about speed. The first convolution layer has 16filters, 3x3 in size. The input shape is 224x224, 3channels. I took padding as 'same' because I did not want to loose any information. Stride of 1(by default) makes the convolutional layer the same height and width as input layer. In the first CNN layer I chose 3x3 vs 2x2 filter size to increase the size of detected pattern. The number of weights/ parameters for the first CNN layer is (3X3X3)X16+16= 448

I planned to use at least three CNN layers to extract relevant feature maps. The number of filters in successive CNN layers will be increased in sequence of 16, 32, 64. The more the number of filters means more stacks of feature maps. So, dimensionality of convolutional layers will increase drastically. More parameters can lead to overfitting. Hence pooling layers are used to reduce dimensionality. Using 'Pooling layers' will help in keeping the same number of feature map, but each feature map will reduce in width and height. I tried the first pooiling layer with stride of 2 and therafter I tried with stride of 1, and noticed that accuracy was more(4.667 as against 3.5) in case of stride of 1. Hence, I took stride of 1 for first pooling layer.

For Conv. layers I used 'relu' as activation function, because it returns positive as it is and converts all negatives to zero.

I referred the following websites regarding if droputs should be used in CNNs and I tried droput after second layer and surprisingly it gave me higher accuracy.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.02158v6.pdf https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/42nnpe/why_do_i_never_see_dropout_applied_in/

from the Srivastava/Hinton dropout paper:

"The additional gain in performance obtained by adding dropout in the convolutional layers (3.02% to 2.55%) is worth noting. One may have presumed that since the convolutional layers don’t have a lot of parameters, overfitting is not a problem and therefore dropout would not have much effect. However, dropout in the lower layers still helps because it provides noisy inputs for the higher fully connected layers which prevents them from overfitting."

After the second max pooling layer I used 'Global Average Pooling layer' for extreme dimensionality reduction. Now, each feature is reduced to single (average) value. I used the Dropout and Dense combination to adjust for possible overfitting associated with the small training size.

In [39]:
from keras.layers import Conv2D, MaxPooling2D, GlobalAveragePooling2D
from keras.layers import Dropout, Flatten, Dense
from keras.models import Sequential

model = Sequential()

### TODO: Define your architecture.
model.add(Conv2D(16, (3, 3), padding='same', input_shape=train_tensors.shape[1:], activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2, strides=1, padding='same'))
model.add(Conv2D(32, (2,2), activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(rate=0.2))
model.add(Conv2D(64, (2,2), activation='relu'))
model.add(MaxPooling2D(pool_size=2, strides=2, padding='same'))
model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D())
model.add(Dense(64, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.4))
model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))
model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
conv2d_4 (Conv2D)            (None, 224, 224, 16)      448       
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_4 (MaxPooling2 (None, 224, 224, 16)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_5 (Conv2D)            (None, 223, 223, 32)      2080      
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_3 (Dropout)          (None, 223, 223, 32)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
conv2d_6 (Conv2D)            (None, 222, 222, 64)      8256      
_________________________________________________________________
max_pooling2d_5 (MaxPooling2 (None, 111, 111, 64)      0         
_________________________________________________________________
global_average_pooling2d_2 ( (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_3 (Dense)              (None, 64)                4160      
_________________________________________________________________
dropout_4 (Dropout)          (None, 64)                0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_4 (Dense)              (None, 133)               8645      
=================================================================
Total params: 23,589.0
Trainable params: 23,589.0
Non-trainable params: 0.0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [40]:
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [29]:
from keras.callbacks import ModelCheckpoint  

### TODO: specify the number of epochs that you would like to use to train the model.

epochs = 20

### Do NOT modify the code below this line.

checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

model.fit(train_tensors, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_tensors, valid_targets),
          epochs=epochs, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8869 - acc: 0.0081Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 4.87448, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.8868 - acc: 0.0081 - val_loss: 4.8745 - val_acc: 0.0096
Epoch 2/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8735 - acc: 0.0122Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 4.87448 to 4.86076, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 82s - loss: 4.8736 - acc: 0.0121 - val_loss: 4.8608 - val_acc: 0.0108
Epoch 3/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8486 - acc: 0.0147Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 4.86076 to 4.83213, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.8484 - acc: 0.0148 - val_loss: 4.8321 - val_acc: 0.0144
Epoch 4/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.8085 - acc: 0.0164Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 4.83213 to 4.79155, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.8090 - acc: 0.0163 - val_loss: 4.7915 - val_acc: 0.0204
Epoch 5/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7776 - acc: 0.0173Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 4.79155 to 4.76240, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.7771 - acc: 0.0174 - val_loss: 4.7624 - val_acc: 0.0204
Epoch 6/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7442 - acc: 0.0203Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 4.76240 to 4.73307, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.7438 - acc: 0.0204 - val_loss: 4.7331 - val_acc: 0.0204
Epoch 7/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.7218 - acc: 0.0200Epoch 00006: val_loss improved from 4.73307 to 4.71826, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.7216 - acc: 0.0199 - val_loss: 4.7183 - val_acc: 0.0180
Epoch 8/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6946 - acc: 0.0237Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 4.71826 to 4.70244, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.6950 - acc: 0.0237 - val_loss: 4.7024 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 9/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6715 - acc: 0.0242Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 4.70244 to 4.67532, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.6711 - acc: 0.0244 - val_loss: 4.6753 - val_acc: 0.0311
Epoch 10/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6527 - acc: 0.0255Epoch 00009: val_loss improved from 4.67532 to 4.65860, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.6533 - acc: 0.0254 - val_loss: 4.6586 - val_acc: 0.0287
Epoch 11/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6319 - acc: 0.0251Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.6320 - acc: 0.0251 - val_loss: 4.6712 - val_acc: 0.0263
Epoch 12/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.6138 - acc: 0.0308Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 4.65860 to 4.64272, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.6137 - acc: 0.0307 - val_loss: 4.6427 - val_acc: 0.0275
Epoch 13/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5943 - acc: 0.0317Epoch 00012: val_loss improved from 4.64272 to 4.61210, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.5944 - acc: 0.0316 - val_loss: 4.6121 - val_acc: 0.0240
Epoch 14/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5725 - acc: 0.0336Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 4.61210 to 4.59966, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.5724 - acc: 0.0338 - val_loss: 4.5997 - val_acc: 0.0311
Epoch 15/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5469 - acc: 0.0369Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 4.59966 to 4.56206, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.5466 - acc: 0.0370 - val_loss: 4.5621 - val_acc: 0.0371
Epoch 16/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5308 - acc: 0.0402Epoch 00015: val_loss improved from 4.56206 to 4.54418, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.5300 - acc: 0.0406 - val_loss: 4.5442 - val_acc: 0.0407
Epoch 17/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.5231 - acc: 0.0371Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.5238 - acc: 0.0370 - val_loss: 4.5500 - val_acc: 0.0431
Epoch 18/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4909 - acc: 0.0395Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.4902 - acc: 0.0397 - val_loss: 4.6111 - val_acc: 0.0395
Epoch 19/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4843 - acc: 0.0437Epoch 00018: val_loss improved from 4.54418 to 4.50594, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.4841 - acc: 0.0437 - val_loss: 4.5059 - val_acc: 0.0395
Epoch 20/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 4.4668 - acc: 0.0465Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 83s - loss: 4.4668 - acc: 0.0466 - val_loss: 4.5080 - val_acc: 0.0407
Out[29]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x7f70c24b5278>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [41]:
model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.from_scratch.hdf5')

Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 1%.

In [42]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
dog_breed_predictions = [np.argmax(model.predict(np.expand_dims(tensor, axis=0))) for tensor in test_tensors]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(dog_breed_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(dog_breed_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 5.2632%

Step 4: Use a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds

To reduce training time without sacrificing accuracy, we show you how to train a CNN using transfer learning. In the following step, you will get a chance to use transfer learning to train your own CNN.

Obtain Bottleneck Features

In [43]:
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogVGG16Data.npz')
train_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_VGG16 = bottleneck_features['test']

Model Architecture

The model uses the the pre-trained VGG-16 model as a fixed feature extractor, where the last convolutional output of VGG-16 is fed as input to our model. We only add a global average pooling layer and a fully connected layer, where the latter contains one node for each dog category and is equipped with a softmax.

In [44]:
VGG16_model = Sequential()
VGG16_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_VGG16.shape[1:]))
VGG16_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

VGG16_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_3 ( (None, 512)               0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_5 (Dense)              (None, 133)               68229     
=================================================================
Total params: 68,229.0
Trainable params: 68,229.0
Non-trainable params: 0.0
_________________________________________________________________

Compile the Model

In [45]:
VGG16_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='rmsprop', metrics=['accuracy'])

Train the Model

In [35]:
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

VGG16_model.fit(train_VGG16, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_VGG16, valid_targets),
          epochs=20, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 12.2928 - acc: 0.1227Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 10.99791, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 12.2895 - acc: 0.1228 - val_loss: 10.9979 - val_acc: 0.2012
Epoch 2/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 10.4235 - acc: 0.2617Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 10.99791 to 10.43134, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 10.4116 - acc: 0.2632 - val_loss: 10.4313 - val_acc: 0.2623
Epoch 3/20
6500/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.9543 - acc: 0.3265Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 10.43134 to 10.17500, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.9327 - acc: 0.3274 - val_loss: 10.1750 - val_acc: 0.2922
Epoch 4/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.6229 - acc: 0.3604Epoch 00003: val_loss improved from 10.17500 to 10.04234, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.6241 - acc: 0.3605 - val_loss: 10.0423 - val_acc: 0.3126
Epoch 5/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.5201 - acc: 0.3761Epoch 00004: val_loss improved from 10.04234 to 9.88577, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.4996 - acc: 0.3766 - val_loss: 9.8858 - val_acc: 0.3174
Epoch 6/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.2668 - acc: 0.3974Epoch 00005: val_loss improved from 9.88577 to 9.64393, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.2548 - acc: 0.3982 - val_loss: 9.6439 - val_acc: 0.3365
Epoch 7/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1500 - acc: 0.4102Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.1516 - acc: 0.4102 - val_loss: 9.6570 - val_acc: 0.3377
Epoch 8/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 9.1094 - acc: 0.4170Epoch 00007: val_loss improved from 9.64393 to 9.55752, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.1121 - acc: 0.4168 - val_loss: 9.5575 - val_acc: 0.3425
Epoch 9/20
6520/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.9849 - acc: 0.4255Epoch 00008: val_loss improved from 9.55752 to 9.47282, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 9.0034 - acc: 0.4244 - val_loss: 9.4728 - val_acc: 0.3497
Epoch 10/20
6540/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.9302 - acc: 0.4329Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 8.9470 - acc: 0.4317 - val_loss: 9.5922 - val_acc: 0.3389
Epoch 11/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.8393 - acc: 0.4367Epoch 00010: val_loss improved from 9.47282 to 9.38904, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 8.8413 - acc: 0.4364 - val_loss: 9.3890 - val_acc: 0.3485
Epoch 12/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.6081 - acc: 0.4492Epoch 00011: val_loss improved from 9.38904 to 9.12853, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 8.6082 - acc: 0.4491 - val_loss: 9.1285 - val_acc: 0.3473
Epoch 13/20
6520/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.2988 - acc: 0.4590Epoch 00012: val_loss improved from 9.12853 to 8.86618, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 8.2975 - acc: 0.4591 - val_loss: 8.8662 - val_acc: 0.3677
Epoch 14/20
6520/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 8.0486 - acc: 0.4706Epoch 00013: val_loss improved from 8.86618 to 8.65492, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 8.0305 - acc: 0.4714 - val_loss: 8.6549 - val_acc: 0.3820
Epoch 15/20
6460/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.7796 - acc: 0.4958Epoch 00014: val_loss improved from 8.65492 to 8.42279, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.7950 - acc: 0.4952 - val_loss: 8.4228 - val_acc: 0.4024
Epoch 16/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.7342 - acc: 0.5035Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.7265 - acc: 0.5040 - val_loss: 8.5067 - val_acc: 0.3952
Epoch 17/20
6480/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.6685 - acc: 0.5093Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.6524 - acc: 0.5100 - val_loss: 8.4236 - val_acc: 0.4096
Epoch 18/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5692 - acc: 0.5174Epoch 00017: val_loss improved from 8.42279 to 8.40413, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.5568 - acc: 0.5181 - val_loss: 8.4041 - val_acc: 0.4072
Epoch 19/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5213 - acc: 0.5245Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.5303 - acc: 0.5240 - val_loss: 8.4506 - val_acc: 0.4012
Epoch 20/20
6440/6680 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 7.5102 - acc: 0.5266Epoch 00019: val_loss improved from 8.40413 to 8.32180, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 7.4906 - acc: 0.5277 - val_loss: 8.3218 - val_acc: 0.4132
Out[35]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x7f70c230a828>

Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [46]:
VGG16_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.VGG16.hdf5')

Test the Model

Now, we can use the CNN to test how well it identifies breed within our test dataset of dog images. We print the test accuracy below.

In [47]:
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
VGG16_predictions = [np.argmax(VGG16_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_VGG16]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(VGG16_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(VGG16_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 44.2584%

Predict Dog Breed with the Model

In [48]:
from extract_bottleneck_features import *

def VGG16_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_VGG16(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = VGG16_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]
In [49]:
VGG16_predict_breed(dog_files_short[1])
Out[49]:
'Great_dane'

Step 5: Create a CNN to Classify Dog Breeds (using Transfer Learning)

You will now use transfer learning to create a CNN that can identify dog breed from images. Your CNN must attain at least 60% accuracy on the test set.

In Step 4, we used transfer learning to create a CNN using VGG-16 bottleneck features. In this section, you must use the bottleneck features from a different pre-trained model. To make things easier for you, we have pre-computed the features for all of the networks that are currently available in Keras:

The files are encoded as such:

Dog{network}Data.npz

where {network}, in the above filename, can be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception. Pick one of the above architectures, download the corresponding bottleneck features, and store the downloaded file in the bottleneck_features/ folder in the repository.

(IMPLEMENTATION) Obtain Bottleneck Features

In the code block below, extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the train, test, and validation sets by running the following:

bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/Dog{network}Data.npz')
train_{network} = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_{network} = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_{network} = bottleneck_features['test']
In [50]:
### TODO: Obtain bottleneck features from another pre-trained CNN.
bottleneck_features = np.load('bottleneck_features/DogResnet50Data.npz')
train_Resnet50 = bottleneck_features['train']
valid_Resnet50 = bottleneck_features['valid']
test_Resnet50 = bottleneck_features['test']

(IMPLEMENTATION) Model Architecture

Create a CNN to classify dog breed. At the end of your code cell block, summarize the layers of your model by executing the line:

    <your model's name>.summary()

Question 5: Outline the steps you took to get to your final CNN architecture and your reasoning at each step. Describe why you think the architecture is suitable for the current problem.

Answer: We used transfer learning to save on training time and reach much higher accuracy in roughly the same amount of training time. It takes pretrained neural network(ResNet-50) in our case and then adapting the neural network to new dataset. The approach for using transfer learning depends on both the size of new data set and the simailarities with the original dataset. The architecture described below is suitable for our current problem because in our case the dog dataset to be predicted is small and similar to original dataset. There are only 6680+835+836= 8351 images (large dataset would have millions of images). ResNet-50 model has pretrained dog images too. So, new data has significant overlap to original subset of data. Since the data sets are similar, images from each data set will have similar higher level features. Therefore most or all of the pre-trained neural network layers already contain relevant information about the new data set and should be kept.

As per 'Udacity' lessons on transfer learning we can see that transfer learning in this case should be used at end of Conv.Net.

Our approach is as follows:

  1. slice off the end of the neural network and add a new fully connected layer that matches the number of classes in the new data set. The new dataset consists of bottleneck features. I downloaded the bottleneck features from ResNet-50 to save training time. These bottleneck features are output of last convolutional layer of ResNet-50 and can be fed directly to our Global average pooling layer.

  2. randomize the weights of the new fully connected layer; freeze all the weights from the pre-trained network

  3. train the network to update the weights of the new fully connected layer

We use GlobalAveragePooling layer for dimensionality reduction, and then the fully connected Dense layer with 'softmax' activation function to give the final prediction and identify among 133 classes of dog breed in our case.

The transfer learning gives better accuracy than model from scratch because when the pretrained images are similar then it is kind of having a bigger data set on which learning has been done before and we can take advantage of the weights available. ResNet-50 has been trained on imageNet database which is very large. Our dataset is very small so learning on such small dataset alone will not give good accuracy. A bigger model means better accuracy. we are taking advantage of ResNet-50 which has been trained on large dataset using state of the art technologies on the best machines available. It was not able to achieve the same result by doing from scratch on limited number of images.

In [51]:
### TODO: Define your architecture.
Resnet50_model = Sequential()
Resnet50_model.add(GlobalAveragePooling2D(input_shape=train_Resnet50.shape[1:]))
Resnet50_model.add(Dense(133, activation='softmax'))

Resnet50_model.summary()
_________________________________________________________________
Layer (type)                 Output Shape              Param #   
=================================================================
global_average_pooling2d_4 ( (None, 2048)              0         
_________________________________________________________________
dense_6 (Dense)              (None, 133)               272517    
=================================================================
Total params: 272,517.0
Trainable params: 272,517.0
Non-trainable params: 0.0
_________________________________________________________________

(IMPLEMENTATION) Compile the Model

In [52]:
### TODO: Compile the model.
Resnet50_model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='rmsprop', metrics=['accuracy'])

(IMPLEMENTATION) Train the Model

Train your model in the code cell below. Use model checkpointing to save the model that attains the best validation loss.

You are welcome to augment the training data, but this is not a requirement.

In [49]:
### TODO: Train the model.
checkpointer = ModelCheckpoint(filepath='saved_models/weights.best.Resnet50.hdf5', 
                               verbose=1, save_best_only=True)

Resnet50_model.fit(train_Resnet50, train_targets, 
          validation_data=(valid_Resnet50, valid_targets),
          epochs=20, batch_size=20, callbacks=[checkpointer], verbose=1)
Train on 6680 samples, validate on 835 samples
Epoch 1/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 1.6391 - acc: 0.6005Epoch 00000: val_loss improved from inf to 0.83756, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.Resnet50.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 1.6238 - acc: 0.6030 - val_loss: 0.8376 - val_acc: 0.7305
Epoch 2/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.4401 - acc: 0.8623Epoch 00001: val_loss improved from 0.83756 to 0.73432, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.Resnet50.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.4427 - acc: 0.8612 - val_loss: 0.7343 - val_acc: 0.7737
Epoch 3/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.2672 - acc: 0.9161Epoch 00002: val_loss improved from 0.73432 to 0.62805, saving model to saved_models/weights.best.Resnet50.hdf5
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.2669 - acc: 0.9163 - val_loss: 0.6280 - val_acc: 0.8000
Epoch 4/20
6620/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1750 - acc: 0.9456Epoch 00003: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.1740 - acc: 0.9461 - val_loss: 0.6479 - val_acc: 0.8012
Epoch 5/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.1254 - acc: 0.9631Epoch 00004: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.1256 - acc: 0.9629 - val_loss: 0.6572 - val_acc: 0.8108
Epoch 6/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0893 - acc: 0.9726Epoch 00005: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0890 - acc: 0.9729 - val_loss: 0.6554 - val_acc: 0.8036
Epoch 7/20
6640/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0654 - acc: 0.9803Epoch 00006: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0652 - acc: 0.9804 - val_loss: 0.6669 - val_acc: 0.8168
Epoch 8/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0505 - acc: 0.9848Epoch 00007: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0501 - acc: 0.9850 - val_loss: 0.6951 - val_acc: 0.8156
Epoch 9/20
6540/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0357 - acc: 0.9901Epoch 00008: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0362 - acc: 0.9901 - val_loss: 0.7722 - val_acc: 0.8096
Epoch 10/20
6660/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0275 - acc: 0.9934Epoch 00009: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0274 - acc: 0.9934 - val_loss: 0.7612 - val_acc: 0.8192
Epoch 11/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0216 - acc: 0.9933Epoch 00010: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0215 - acc: 0.9933 - val_loss: 0.7732 - val_acc: 0.8192
Epoch 12/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0189 - acc: 0.9956Epoch 00011: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0187 - acc: 0.9957 - val_loss: 0.7670 - val_acc: 0.8251
Epoch 13/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0113 - acc: 0.9974Epoch 00012: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0133 - acc: 0.9972 - val_loss: 0.7768 - val_acc: 0.8263
Epoch 14/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0110 - acc: 0.9973Epoch 00013: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0114 - acc: 0.9972 - val_loss: 0.7858 - val_acc: 0.8204
Epoch 15/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0088 - acc: 0.9983Epoch 00014: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0087 - acc: 0.9984 - val_loss: 0.8736 - val_acc: 0.8108
Epoch 16/20
6620/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0085 - acc: 0.9971Epoch 00015: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0086 - acc: 0.9972 - val_loss: 0.8354 - val_acc: 0.8275
Epoch 17/20
6560/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0077 - acc: 0.9980Epoch 00016: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0076 - acc: 0.9981 - val_loss: 0.8990 - val_acc: 0.8156
Epoch 18/20
6580/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0046 - acc: 0.9983Epoch 00017: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0070 - acc: 0.9979 - val_loss: 0.8966 - val_acc: 0.8263
Epoch 19/20
6600/6680 [============================>.] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0054 - acc: 0.9985Epoch 00018: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0053 - acc: 0.9985 - val_loss: 0.9056 - val_acc: 0.8287
Epoch 20/20
6400/6680 [===========================>..] - ETA: 0s - loss: 0.0043 - acc: 0.9987Epoch 00019: val_loss did not improve
6680/6680 [==============================] - 1s - loss: 0.0044 - acc: 0.9987 - val_loss: 0.9232 - val_acc: 0.8287
Out[49]:
<keras.callbacks.History at 0x7f70c211aeb8>

(IMPLEMENTATION) Load the Model with the Best Validation Loss

In [53]:
### TODO: Load the model weights with the best validation loss.
Resnet50_model.load_weights('saved_models/weights.best.Resnet50.hdf5')

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test the Model

Try out your model on the test dataset of dog images. Ensure that your test accuracy is greater than 60%.

In [54]:
### TODO: Calculate classification accuracy on the test dataset.
# get index of predicted dog breed for each image in test set
Resnet50_predictions = [np.argmax(Resnet50_model.predict(np.expand_dims(feature, axis=0))) for feature in test_Resnet50]

# report test accuracy
test_accuracy = 100*np.sum(np.array(Resnet50_predictions)==np.argmax(test_targets, axis=1))/len(Resnet50_predictions)
print('Test accuracy: %.4f%%' % test_accuracy)
Test accuracy: 79.3062%

(IMPLEMENTATION) Predict Dog Breed with the Model

Write a function that takes an image path as input and returns the dog breed (Affenpinscher, Afghan_hound, etc) that is predicted by your model.

Similar to the analogous function in Step 5, your function should have three steps:

  1. Extract the bottleneck features corresponding to the chosen CNN model.
  2. Supply the bottleneck features as input to the model to return the predicted vector. Note that the argmax of this prediction vector gives the index of the predicted dog breed.
  3. Use the dog_names array defined in Step 0 of this notebook to return the corresponding breed.

The functions to extract the bottleneck features can be found in extract_bottleneck_features.py, and they have been imported in an earlier code cell. To obtain the bottleneck features corresponding to your chosen CNN architecture, you need to use the function

extract_{network}

where {network}, in the above filename, should be one of VGG19, Resnet50, InceptionV3, or Xception.

In [55]:
### TODO: Write a function that takes a path to an image as input
### and returns the dog breed that is predicted by the model.
from extract_bottleneck_features import *

def Resnet50_predict_breed(img_path):
    # extract bottleneck features
    bottleneck_feature = extract_Resnet50(path_to_tensor(img_path))
    # obtain predicted vector
    predicted_vector = Resnet50_model.predict(bottleneck_feature)
    # return dog breed that is predicted by the model
    return dog_names[np.argmax(predicted_vector)]
In [56]:
Resnet50_predict_breed(dog_files_short[1])
Out[56]:
'Dalmatian'

Step 6: Write your Algorithm

Write an algorithm that accepts a file path to an image and first determines whether the image contains a human, dog, or neither. Then,

  • if a dog is detected in the image, return the predicted breed.
  • if a human is detected in the image, return the resembling dog breed.
  • if neither is detected in the image, provide output that indicates an error.

You are welcome to write your own functions for detecting humans and dogs in images, but feel free to use the face_detector and dog_detector functions developed above. You are required to use your CNN from Step 5 to predict dog breed.

Some sample output for our algorithm is provided below, but feel free to design your own user experience!

Sample Human Output

(IMPLEMENTATION) Write your Algorithm

In [57]:
### TODO: Write your algorithm.
### Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
from IPython.core.display import Image, display
import numpy as np
from glob import glob
def human_or_dog(img_path=""):
    display(Image(img_path,width=200,height=200))
    if dog_detector(img_path):
        print('image of dog is detected' )
        dog_breed_predicted = Resnet50_predict_breed(img_path)
        print("Dog's breed:",dog_breed_predicted )
    elif face_detector(img_path):
        print('Image of a human is detected')
        human_resemble_dog_breed_predicted = Resnet50_predict_breed(img_path)
        print('This human resembles:',human_resemble_dog_breed_predicted )
    else:
        print('Not sure if it is a dog or human')
In [67]:
sample_files = np.array(glob("pictures_dog_project/*"))
print(sample_files)
['pictures_dog_project/1_1.jpg'
 'pictures_dog_project/Male_monarch_butterfly.JPG'
 'pictures_dog_project/cat.jpg' 'pictures_dog_project/Chihuahua.jpg'
 'pictures_dog_project/Lily_083.JPG'
 'pictures_dog_project/Cumberbatch_sherlock_301.jpg'
 'pictures_dog_project/Alaskan-dogs-810x559.jpg'
 'pictures_dog_project/Julia_Roberts_2011_Shankbone_3.JPG']

Step 7: Test Your Algorithm

In this section, you will take your new algorithm for a spin! What kind of dog does the algorithm think that you look like? If you have a dog, does it predict your dog's breed accurately? If you have a cat, does it mistakenly think that your cat is a dog?

(IMPLEMENTATION) Test Your Algorithm on Sample Images!

Test your algorithm at least six images on your computer. Feel free to use any images you like. Use at least two human and two dog images.

Question 6: Is the output better than you expected :) ? Or worse :( ? Provide at least three possible points of improvement for your algorithm.

__Answer: It is almost what I expected, except for butterfly where I would have expected neither dog or human as answer, but it identified a butterfly as human.

 The first image has both a dog and resembling human, so I think it rightly picked the Poodle and in this case it is justified to ignore the human.

 I was not sure about if it gets confused and identifies Cat as dog, but it did a good job here. Chihuahua, Alaskan_malamute identification is perfect. My pet dog is Maltese mix, but it identified as Chinese_crested. May be my dog has some genes of Chinese crested.

 It matched Julia Roberts to Silky Terrier, and Cumberbatch_sherlock as Akita. Really a close match.

The three possible points for improvement of my algorithm are as follows:

  1. In one of the images it identified my pet dog 'Lily' as Chinese crested. The images of chinese crested don't exactly resemble my dog because she is a mixed breed. So, I should have tried to get an output of probabilities of predicted breed. We were told that she is 'Maltese mix' when we got her. This could have help me get the probability of her being maltese.

  2. I could have used 'Inception' and Xception for transfer learnig as well and used them to predict my images. May be they would have predicted with more accuracy. I used Resnet because Resnet50's test accuracy came out to be 79.3062% whereas VGG16's accuracy was just 44.6%. I tried Inception out of curiosity, and got the accuracy of 79.8% (almost same as Resnet50).I could have tried the remaining 'Inception', and 'Xception' for predicting my breeds.

  3. My algorithm should have included if both human and dog are detected in the same picture (picture1). As per my algorithm in the first 'if' statement only dog image is checked. In picture1 it was satisfied and then it did not even go to 'elif' statement where human face was checked. I could have put an 'OR' condition to check for both.

    It shouldn't have classified butterfly as human. May be some more training images could have helped solve this. I could have used other human face detecting classifier. Haar classifier did not give very good accuracy. It identified 11% dog images as human.

As per the paper published in the link below there are various face detection system. I would like to improve the face detection classifier in my algorithm next time.

https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1404/1404.1292.pdf https://dzone.com/articles/cnn-vs-cascade-classifiers-for-object-detection "In future work, a face detection system will be suggested based on using Pattern Net and Back propagation neural network (BPNN) with many hidden layers. Different network architectures and parameters’ values of BPNN and PatternNet will be adopted to determine PatternNet architecture that will result in best performance values of face detection system."

__

In [68]:
## TODO: Execute your algorithm from Step 6 on
## at least 6 images on your computer.
## Feel free to use as many code cells as needed.
for pics in sample_files:
    human_or_dog(pics)
image of dog is detected
Dog's breed: Poodle
Image of a human is detected
This human resembles: German_pinscher
Not sure if it is a dog or human
image of dog is detected
Dog's breed: Chihuahua
image of dog is detected
Dog's breed: Chinese_crested
Image of a human is detected
This human resembles: Akita
image of dog is detected
Dog's breed: Alaskan_malamute
Image of a human is detected
This human resembles: Silky_terrier